Skip directly to content

investors

How Do I Meet an Investor? Part 1: Be prepared

on Thu, 2012-03-22 09:36

One of the questions I get most frequently from entrepreneurs whether they need $50K or $5M is, “How can I get meetings with investors?”

The short answer is, “By getting a warm introduction from someone the investors know and trust.” But since most entrepreneurs asking me the question are doing so because they don’t have the connections to get the introduction, a longer answer is needed.

When is the Right Time to Pitch to an Investor?

Some inventors think they are ready to meet investors as soon as they have come up with a good idea. Many more think the time is right as soon as they have filed a disclosure with the US Patent Office.

The fact is that you are nowhere near ready to meet an investor at this stage. Investors are not in the business of investing in innovative ideas. They are in the business of earning a substantial return on their investment in a business that is based on innovative ideas.

The diagram at right indicates the milestones you should achieve between coming up with your innovation and eventually pitching to investors, and the approximate order in which you should expect to achieve them. I like to use pitch development to check on the completeness of the business plan and I certainly prefer to have the 30 second and 10-minute versions of my pitch ready to go prior to getting a warm introduction to investors.

But what if it’s a really good idea?

You may be able to raise interest among some investors with your new idea before you’ve developed a plausible business case for its commercialization if it is truly remarkable and has been demonstrated to work at least at a lab scale.

However, your chances of raising money are small and, even if you do, the valuation you get is likely to be disappointingly low. Worse still, by starting too early in the fundraising process, you run the very real risk of becoming “stale” if investors perceive that you’ve been around too long without raising funds. Even if you take a perfectly reasonable amount of time to get to the point of being investable, you can gain a reputation for not executing simply by pitching for a long time to a lot of investors.

But what if you are running out of funds?

In that case, I urge you even more strongly to find an alternate source of funding – your salary, grants, friends & family, even credit cards – to tide you over until you have built a robust case for a business based on your invention. In addition to my comments above, having a sense of desperation about you is just as counterproductive when meeting with an investor as it is when you are dating.

It's the Right Time When...

The right time to pitch for money is when you don't need it, which is why most startup CEOs are out there pitching the company nonstop, especially after having just raised a round. Of course, you may not have that luxury; chances are, the lack of sufficient money is a daily worry.  Unfortunately, the urgency of your need is not the problem of any investor who has not already invested in your company (and often not even then). In fact, having a desperate need for money suggests a much higher risk associated with the company than the investor is likely to want to take.

You don't have to have all your ducks in a row to pitch to an investor, but you do need to have enough of your value proposition thought through and validated that you can speak with confidence and authority.  At a minimum, you need to know:

© David Paul Ohmer

  • How big your addressable market is
  • Why your idea is faster, better and cheaper (or at least cheaper) than what the customer is currently doing or your competition is offering
  • How you are protecting your intellectual property
  • How you are going to make money when the company is fully operational
  • Roughly how much revenue and income you are going to make at that point
  • Who is on your team and who is missing
  • When and how you plan to exit
  • How much money you need to get there

Do Not Waste Your Opportunity to Pitch!

Until you have something smart and defensible to say about each of these points, you are not ready to be taken seriously by a professional investor. This list is pretty much your full business plan with the exception of demonstrating your proof of concept or prototype.  I've left that out because that kind of technical development can take a lot of time and money to address and it's something that you can potentially convince an investor is worth bankrolling, at least in small amounts.

If you've got a sufficiently good story for the rest of it, you can get away with an investor pitch at this point, provided you are not proposing to break a couple laws of physics to get your prototype done. Everything else in that list can be addressed by talking to potential customers and doing research into the market and your industry, so get on the phone, go out and talk to people, and use your computer to put together the compelling value proposition you know your technology enables!

Founder Question: To CEO or Not To CEO? (part 2 of 2)

on Sat, 2012-02-11 13:17

Last time, I introduced a dilemma many founders face when they are finally negotiating term sheets with potential investors:

Should you accept an investment if the terms require you to step down as CEO?

I wrote about this issue because a past client recently lost an opportunity to fund his startup when the investors insisted that his partner be the CEO Instead of him. I don't know enough about the situation to be able to evaluate whether his decision was right or wrong, but it's an issue you should think through, and preferably when you're not under pressure.

10 Questions to Consider

If you are in the position of weighing a decision between investment and remaining CEO, congratulations! Most entrepreneurs never get to this point - you are obviously doing something right.

Questions to consider when making this critical decision:

  1. Do the investors have a reputation for dealing with founders fairly?
  2. Are they offering you enough funding to make a difference in your ability to succeed?
  3. Do the investors have real domain expertise?
  4. Do the investors want to bring in someone from outside or just make someone else on the team the CEO?
  5. How much experience do you have in running a business?
  6. Is it OK with you not to be working on the technology very much, if at all?
  7. How important is it to you to be the public face of the company?
  8. How much do you enjoy constantly being on the road, pitching the company?
  9. Are you very good at pitching the company?
  10. Are you OK with the fact that you will need to make unpopular decisions based on inadequate data that could make or break the company?*

* Hint: if your responses to questions 1 through 9 suggest that a different person as CEO might be better but you still answer question 10 in the affirmative, chances are you are letting your emotions get in the way of making a sound business decision - not what you want in a CEO.

After all you've given in blood, sweat and tears to the success of your company, it's very difficult to have a completely objective perspective about your startup. I strongly encourage you to talk to people who you respect and trust, and who are independent. Then listen to what they say even if it's not what you want to hear.

What do you think? Would you use other questions in addition to or instead of the 10 above? Who do you turn to when you need an honest sounding board?

When Investors Don't Want You to Be CEO of Your Own Company (part 1 of 2)

on Sat, 2012-02-11 10:55

I recently learned that a former client of mine who I'll call George had finally, after years of struggling, gotten term sheets from reputable investors for investment in his startup. By now, he should have the money in hand and be going gangbusters, executing on his strategy.

Unfortunately, it all fell apart. Why? He wanted to be remain CEO. The investors wanted his partner to take the job. George said thanks, but no thanks.

I don't know all the details of this situation, but the outcome breaks my heart. George deserved to be successful, to grow the company with the benefit of significant resources. He'd worked hard, believed in the company when others did not, and brought it to the point that investors wanted in.

Who Is Right and Who Is Wrong?

The dilemma usually arises from the following perspectives:

  • Investor: I like this technology and its potential for success, but the founding CEO does not have the skill/ personality/ whatever it takes to give the company the best chance for success. No way am I investing my money in a company that's run by someone who is unlikely to achieve success.
  • Founder: I lke these investors, but there is no way that they really understand what needs to be done to achieve the vision for this company. If they install someone else as CEO, this company is unlikely to become the success it deserves to be. Besides, it's my company, I deserve to run it! What if they decide to fire me from the company altogether??

Answer: It Depends.

As in most real world situations, neither side is likely to be 100% right. You are in the position of needing them more than they need you so unfortunately you have less leverage. Depending on how close you are to your cash cliff, you need to consider whether remaining in charge is worth killing the company. Remember that investors talk to each other early and often, so if one group walks from a deal it will be that much harder to get another.

That said, remaining in control might be the right thing to do. In the next post, I'll give you some questions to consider when trying to make this tough decision.

Have you ever had to consider this option? How did it resolve? What would you do differently? (Please don't use real names in any of your posts as this is a public forum.)